By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Policy for more information.

Filton25

Stand with courageous activists held under terrorism powers for opposing genocide.

Key information

On 6 August 2024, after witnessing a live streamed genocide, 6 activists took direct action at Elbit Systems factory in Filton, Bristol. The factory is known as a research and development hub but it is in fact a site that produces weapons to be used by the Israeli army on Palestinians in Gaza. The 6 activists dismantled weapons, including quadcopters that have been used in the genocide in Gaza. This drone shoots out 8 lethal pellets designed to seriously maim or kill those it targets.

The campaign started as the Filton6, and grew to become the Filton25 as activists were arrested and detained by counter terrorism police, following violent dawn raids which traumatised families and loved ones. They were charged with aggravated burglary, violent disorder and criminal damage. All 25 were held on remand in prisons across the UK.

​The Filton25 case is an assault on pro-Palestine activists and marks a significant escalation by the British state in defence of Israel. Terrorism legislation leads to an abuse of due process and undermines the people's fundamental rights under the guise of national security. Despite the use of terrorism powers in the case of the Filton25, they have not been charged under terrorism legislation but through backdoor legal provisions. However, the Crown Prosecution Service is attempting to secure harsh terror related sentences for the Filton25's alleged offences even though the offences would never meet the threshold to be charged under terrorism.

​The first 6 who were inside the factory and admitted to destroying weapons were tried in November 2025 where the jury failed to convict them of any offence and they and the rest of their co-defendants were all acquitted on the most serious charge of aggravated burglary. This resulted in the freedom of 5 of the 6 activists, as well as the freedom of their co-defendants. In April 2026 the 6 were re-tried, with severe restrictions placed by the Judge on what they could tell the jury about why they took action. 4 of them were found guilty of criminal damage and the judge arbitrarily remanded them back into custody against the recommendation made by the CPS.

Judge Johnson denied them any legal defences to explain why they were forced to take direct action. He also prevented them from mentioning the genocide in Gaza and what Elbit Systems produces in their UK based weapons factories. He accepted that Yvette Cooper had willfully breached his rulings and was in contempt of court, but failed to take any action against her. Contrastingly, he referred the lead KC on the case to the High court for alleged contempt of court for his closing speech on the jury’s right to acquit based on their conscience. The Judge also withheld important information from the jury and directed them to find the activists guilty.

On the 12th of June 2026, the 4 activists are set to be sentenced and the prosecution are arguing that there is a terrorism connection in order to secure a longer sentence against the activists and ongoing and long term state surveillance.

Take action today and write to demand Judge Johnson recuses himself from the case immediately. 

Also click on the link to complete Newcord's call to action to write to your MP regarding the Filton25 sentencing: https://newscord.org/action/filton25-sentencing

Media and Resources

Insights from our investigations and research

No items found.
No items found.

What Imams and survivors say about us?

Stand with those demanding justice

Your support strengthens communities fighting for accountability and change

To:
Woolwichcrowncourt@justice.gov.uk
Cc:
campaigns@cage.ngo
Subject:
URGENT: FAO Judge Jeremy Johnson

Dear Judge Johnson,

I am writing as a concerned citizen following the disturbing news of the political corruption at the heart of the Filton25 case, including your biased decisions throughout. 

Charlotte Head, Leona Kamio, Fatema Zainab Rajwani and Samuel Corner are potentially facing years in prison for taking action to stop the massacre of Palestinians at the hands of Elbit Systems. They have been unlawfully remanded back to custody in order to appease this genocidal private company and they must be released immediately. 

Since the outset of this case:

  • You have continuously refused to grant bail despite many of the defendants meeting the legal requirements for bail, resulting in extended punishment by process for up to 18 months, exceeding the 6 month custody time limit 
  • You have ignored all reasonable requests made by the defence, including denying their abuse of process application where it was accepted by all parties that Yvette Cooper’s opinion piece about the Filton case and the proscription of Palestine Action would prejudice a jury against the activists, yet you still failed to take action 
  • You failed to hold Elbit Systems or the police accountable for the fact that CCTV evidence was covered up in this case 
  • You failed to hold Elbit accountable at all for their participation in war crimes, violent employees or manipulation of the facts presented to the jury 
  • You ruled that there is a terrorism connection in this case last year which resulted in the defendants’ extended imprisonment and mistreatment in prison as they were classified as terrorist prisoners 

I am writing to the court with urgency to demand that you immediately recuse yourself from the case of the Filton25. The sentencing of the Filton activists should be done by an impartial judge, not one that has denied the Palestinian genocide and denied the Filton25 their right to a fair trial. These 4 activists should be released immediately as they have already served their sentence. 

It is clear from this case that this is a miscarriage of justice and your removal from this case is the first step in rectifying the harm that has been done. I request an immediate response to this email. 

Yours sincerely,

[ADD YOUR NAME]