By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Policy for more information.

We Research

Producing cutting edge authentic and accurate reports, briefings and papers documenting the abuses of the ‘war on terror’. 

Call our helpline
0300 030 2243
Email us at
casework@cage.ngo

WE RESEARCH

Unique insights

Researching the War on Terror

We produce cutting edge reports, briefings and papers documenting the abuse of due process and the erosion of the rule of law in the context of the ‘war on terror’. 

Thanks to our unique access to impacted individuals and communities and the trust established with them, we are able to build our reports on unmatched authentic and accurate primary source information.

In addition, our empirical analysis and investigations into subjects related to far-reaching impacts of the ‘war on terror’ on law, people and communities, mean that our research reports are widely referenced and acknowledged by leading academics and organisations.

Our research and analysis aims to cut through the noise and provide an invaluable critical perspective for our advocacy work.

Reports

News Categories
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Submission to the Home Office Schedule 7 consultation

June 10, 2014
<div class="field_pub_report"><a href="/"></a></div><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font color="#333333" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/CP___Schedule_7_review.pdf" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37);"><img alt="" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/icon-pdf.gif" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: none 0px; vertical-align: -5px;" />&nbsp;Download the report</a></font></strong></p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><strong>CP provides a submission to the Home Office submission to the Schedule 7 consultation.&nbsp;</strong></p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br />CagePrisoners welcomes the Home Office review of Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act of 2000. &nbsp;We commend the public review of these powers, which have been a great source of concern to Muslim communities in the UK and exacerbated existing tensions between law enforcement and minority groups.&nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Yet as we outline in this submission, CagePrisoners is doubtful that simply altering Schedule 7 powers as outlined in the Home Office report is sufficient, however well-meaning these changes may be. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Firstly, Muslim communities and minority groups complain of having been humiliated, frustrated and inconvenienced by Schedule 7 stops at a rate that far surpasses the non-Muslim majority. &nbsp;The very basis on which Schedule 7 searches are conducted &ndash; selection based on intuition or unspecified risk factors rather than reasonable suspicion &ndash; is counterproductive to combatting terrorism and may constitute a violation of human rights. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Secondly, the perception that to stop members of &ldquo;suspect communities&rdquo; rather than suspected individuals &ndash; as currently happens &ndash; is neither a moral nor an effective way to fight terrorism. CagePrisoners urges the Home Office to learn from the troubling legacies of other stop and search powers, namely Section 1 and 44, and the demonstrated existence of institutionalized racism in our police forces, as detailed in the MacPherson report. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Finally, Schedule 7 stops could become an easy gateway for law enforcement to pursue other kinds of civil and human rights abuses, as clearly demonstrated by the case of Madhi Hashi. &nbsp;As this submission details, while the proposed changes to Section 7 are a step forward, they are not enough to engender trust in minority communities about Schedule 7 powers, given that Schedule 7 has become so notorious for breaches of basic civil and human rights.</p>

Submission to Home Office stop and search consultation

June 10, 2014
<div class="field_pub_report"><a href="/"></a></div><p><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 13px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font color="#333333" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/CP_S44_CONSULTATION.pdf" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37);"><img alt="" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/icon-pdf.gif" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: none 0px; vertical-align: -5px;" />&nbsp;Download the report</a></font></strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>CP provides a submission to the Home office counter-terrorism stop and search consultation.&nbsp;</strong></p>

Submission to the Home Office Schedule 7 consultation

June 10, 2014
<div class="field_pub_report"><a href="/"></a></div><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font color="#333333" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/CP___Schedule_7_review.pdf" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37);"><img alt="" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/icon-pdf.gif" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: none 0px; vertical-align: -5px;" />&nbsp;Download the report</a></font></strong></p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><strong>CP provides a submission to the Home Office submission to the Schedule 7 consultation.&nbsp;</strong></p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><br />CagePrisoners welcomes the Home Office review of Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act of 2000. &nbsp;We commend the public review of these powers, which have been a great source of concern to Muslim communities in the UK and exacerbated existing tensions between law enforcement and minority groups.&nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Yet as we outline in this submission, CagePrisoners is doubtful that simply altering Schedule 7 powers as outlined in the Home Office report is sufficient, however well-meaning these changes may be. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Firstly, Muslim communities and minority groups complain of having been humiliated, frustrated and inconvenienced by Schedule 7 stops at a rate that far surpasses the non-Muslim majority. &nbsp;The very basis on which Schedule 7 searches are conducted &ndash; selection based on intuition or unspecified risk factors rather than reasonable suspicion &ndash; is counterproductive to combatting terrorism and may constitute a violation of human rights. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Secondly, the perception that to stop members of &ldquo;suspect communities&rdquo; rather than suspected individuals &ndash; as currently happens &ndash; is neither a moral nor an effective way to fight terrorism. CagePrisoners urges the Home Office to learn from the troubling legacies of other stop and search powers, namely Section 1 and 44, and the demonstrated existence of institutionalized racism in our police forces, as detailed in the MacPherson report. &nbsp;</p><p style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Finally, Schedule 7 stops could become an easy gateway for law enforcement to pursue other kinds of civil and human rights abuses, as clearly demonstrated by the case of Madhi Hashi. &nbsp;As this submission details, while the proposed changes to Section 7 are a step forward, they are not enough to engender trust in minority communities about Schedule 7 powers, given that Schedule 7 has become so notorious for breaches of basic civil and human rights.</p>

Submission to Home Office stop and search consultation

June 10, 2014
<div class="field_pub_report"><a href="/"></a></div><p><strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'Open Sans', sans-serif; font-size: 13px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font color="#333333" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><a href="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/CP_S44_CONSULTATION.pdf" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; transition: color 0.3s linear, background; -webkit-transition: color 0.3s linear, background; outline: none 0px; border: 0px none; color: rgb(241, 88, 37);"><img alt="" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/icon-pdf.gif" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-style: none; outline: none 0px; vertical-align: -5px;" />&nbsp;Download the report</a></font></strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>CP provides a submission to the Home office counter-terrorism stop and search consultation.&nbsp;</strong></p>

Unnecessary and disproportional: the killings of Anwar and Abdul Rahman al-Awlaki

December 28, 2013
<div class="field_article_img"><div><b>Image:</b></div><img src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/image001_48.jpg"></div><div class="field_article_author"><div><b>Written By:</b></div>CAGE Editor</div><p><a href="http://www.cageprisoners.com/media/k2/items/cache/2eacf501e73efaa39f002f3a4aeb5ee0_XL.jpg" title="&quot;Click to preview image&quot; "><img alt="Unnecessary and disproportional: the killings of Anwar and Abdul Rahman al-Awlaki" src="https://cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/image001_46.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 200px; height: 283px;" /></a></p><p><strong>One year since the assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki CagePrisoners publishes a report which reveals what role he really played in the Al-Qaeda leadership</strong></p><p><a href="http://cageprisoners.com/pdf/AwlakiReport_4.pdf">Download full report here</a></p><p><em>&ldquo;How excellent would it be if you ask brother Basir to send us the resume, in detail and lengthy, of brother Anwar al-&lsquo;Awlaqi, as well as the facts he relied on when recommending him&hellip;and how excellent would it be if he gives us a chance to be introduced to him more&hellip;&rdquo;</em></p><p>- Usamah Bin Laden (more than a year after US Justice Department&rsquo;s memo &lsquo;legalising&rsquo; the targeted killing of Awlaki)</p><p><em>&ldquo;As for my husband who was assassinated by a US drone exactly one year from today, I believe strongly that his killing has nothing to do with the allegations by the US that he has links to terrorist attacks, but rather to silence him because of his influence on Muslims in the Western world as a Muslim scholar and preacher&hellip;the drone programme is wrong and illegal because it kills a lot more civilians than so called [high] valuable targets.&rdquo;</em></p><p>&ndash; Gihan Mohsen Baker, wife of Anwar al-Awlaki</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Exactly a year ago, American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki was killed in a drone strike carried out by the US in Northern Yemen &ndash; only one of scores that are dying as part of a programme of extrajudicial killings.&nbsp;</p><p>On the anniversary of his killing, CagePrisoners releases its report&nbsp;<strong>&ldquo;Unnecessary and Disproportional: The Killing of Anwar and Abdul-Rahman al-Awlaki&rdquo;.</strong></p><p>This report analyses and challenges the narrative developed by various governments and media outlets to justify the assassination of the Muslim cleric, presenting him as a leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and the mastermind behind several attacks against the USA.&nbsp; The report also highlights how dangerous such a narrative can be as it extends to include the targeting and killing of Awlaki&rsquo;s 16 year old son, also an American citizen, a few days later.</p><p>With only a few weeks left until Election Day, most people will be focused on the election campaigns of President Obama &ndash; few will remember that it is under Obama&rsquo;s leadership that the policy of targeted killings has intensified and expanded.&nbsp; This report will throw light on the legal and moral inconsistencies that appear as a Nobel Peace Prize winning President continues developing his drone programme enabling him to carry out extra-judicial killings across the globe, picking off targets on a &lsquo;kill list&rsquo; once a week.&nbsp;</p><p>Through the case study of Anwar and Abdur Rahman al-Awlaki, questions are also raised about the UK&rsquo;s involvement in targeted killings as more evidence emerges of British citizens that have been killed in drone attacks including evidence to suggest that British authorities actively assist the CIA in its drone&nbsp;programme.&nbsp;</p><p>CagePrisoners demands complete transparency in relation to the process by which individuals are placed on President Obama&rsquo;s &lsquo;kill list&rsquo;, independent investigations into civilian deaths and injuries during drone strikes and the end to British complicity and the complicity of any other States, with US drone strikes.</p><p>MoazzamBegg, Director of CagePrisoners and former detainee at Bagram and Guantanamo Bay&nbsp;says:<em>&nbsp;&ldquo;In 2001, the Bush administration initiated its rendition program,&nbsp;</em><em>organising</em><em>&nbsp;the kidnapping, torture and illegal detention of Muslims all across the world, a program in which I was a victim before being released without any explanation. Many hoped that President Obama would end this War of Terror.&nbsp; However, not only did he not stop, he went further by assassinating anyone that he deemed a terror suspect. We now know that the United Kingdom was fully aware and fully involved in Bush&rsquo;s rendition program and abuses including the torture and unlawful imprisonment of some of its own nationals. Likewise and sadly, there is little doubt that British authorities are complicit in Obama&rsquo;s programme of extra-judicial killing. Several years ago, CagePrisoners supported Anwar Al-Awlaki since he was detained without charge or trial. Today, we feel compelled to release this report since he was executed without charge or trial&rdquo;</em></p>

Application to Deproscribe Hamas

June 10, 2025
This is some text inside of a div block.

Report: Britain's Apartheid Apologists

May 27, 2025
This is some text inside of a div block.

The Conscious Muslim Guide

July 24, 2024
This is some text inside of a div block.

Letter to the EC president

March 8, 2021
This is some text inside of a div block.

Exploiting the Pandemic

May 14, 2020
This is some text inside of a div block.

Letter to Home Secretary

January 23, 2020
This is some text inside of a div block.

Schedule 7: Harassment at Borders

August 20, 2019
This is some text inside of a div block.

CCE Exposed Report

January 6, 2019
This is some text inside of a div block.

Africa Review: Ethiopia report

May 31, 2017
This is some text inside of a div block.

The 'Science' of Pre-Crime

September 28, 2016
This is some text inside of a div block.

Consent Denied report

January 29, 2016
This is some text inside of a div block.

CAGE Brochure

July 6, 2015
This is some text inside of a div block.

ISC inquiry NGO joint letter

November 8, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Serious Crime Bill Submission

October 23, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Blowback report

July 17, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Tackling Extremism in the UK: Part I

December 1, 2013
This is some text inside of a div block.

Tackling Extremism in the UK: Part II

December 1, 2013
This is some text inside of a div block.

Guantanamo Begins at Home report

April 1, 2012
This is some text inside of a div block.

CagePrisoners Annual Report 2010-11

December 1, 2011
This is some text inside of a div block.

Too blunt for just outcomes report

June 1, 2011
This is some text inside of a div block.

Detention Immorality report

November 1, 2009
This is some text inside of a div block.

Blacklisted report

August 20, 2009
This is some text inside of a div block.

Off the Record report

June 1, 2007
This is some text inside of a div block.

Fabricating Terrorism I report

March 1, 2006
This is some text inside of a div block.

Report on Ghost Detention

November 12, 2005
This is some text inside of a div block.

The Guantanamo Detainees report

May 13, 2004
This is some text inside of a div block.

Beyond the Law report

December 20, 2001
This is some text inside of a div block.
Button Text

monthly policy briefings

Each month, CAGE analysts will provide briefings on important policy developments in Britain, France and Austria relating to counter-terrorism and national security policies. The briefings are designed to be short, indispensable references for activists, academics and others interested in keeping up to date with the proliferation of War on Terror-era policies worldwide.