By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Policy for more information.

We Research

Producing cutting edge reports, briefings and papers documenting the abuses of the ‘war on terror’. 

Call our helpline
0300 030 2243
Email us at
casework@cage.ngo

WE RESEARCH

Unique insights

Researching the War on Terror

We produce cutting edge reports, briefings and papers documenting the abuse of due process and the erosion of the rule of law in the context of the ‘war on terror’. 

Thanks to our unique access to impacted individuals and communities and the trust established with them, we are able to build our reports on unmatched primary source information.

In addition, our empirical analysis and investigations into subjects related to far-reaching impacts of the ‘war on terror’ on law, people and communities, mean that our research reports are widely referenced and acknowledged by leading academics and organisations.

Our research and analysis aims to cut through the noise and provide an invaluable critical perspective for our advocacy work.

Reports

News Categories
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

CAGE Paper deconstructs Tony Blair Institute report: ‘Narratives of Division’

January 24, 2019
<span style="font-weight: 400;">This paper is a response to the newly released report ‘Narratives of Division: The Spectrum of Islamist Worldviews in the UK’ by the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. Following its publication late last week, we <a href="https://www.cage.ngo/tony-blairs-new-report-is-a-poor-attempt-at-censoring-muslim-voices-and-dictating-islamic-belief">issued a statement</a> outlining how it is “an academically flawed attempt to remould Islamic belief and silence Muslim voices that challenge repressive state policies.”</span> <span style="font-weight: 400;">In this paper, we debunk the central claims of the report, shed more light on the political motivations for it, and place its release in the current context of counter-extremism in Britain.</span> [fusion_button link="https://www.cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CAGEResponse_TonyBlair_NarrativeDivision_FINAL.pdf" title="" target="_blank" link_attributes="" alignment="center" modal="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" color="default" button_gradient_top_color="" button_gradient_bottom_color="" button_gradient_top_color_hover="" button_gradient_bottom_color_hover="" accent_color="" accent_hover_color="" type="" bevel_color="" border_width="" size="large" stretch="no" shape="" icon="" icon_position="left" icon_divider="no" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset=""]Download the paper here[/fusion_button] &nbsp; <h3>View online:</h3> <p style="text-align: center;">[pdf-embedder url="https://www.cage.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/CAGEResponse_TonyBlair_NarrativeDivision_FINAL.pdf"]</p>

CCE Exposed: The Islamophobia Industry policing thoughts and beliefs report

January 6, 2019
[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent="no" hundred_percent_height="no" hundred_percent_height_scroll="no" hundred_percent_height_center_content="yes" equal_height_columns="no" menu_anchor="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" status="published" publish_date="" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="center center" background_repeat="no-repeat" fade="no" background_parallax="none" enable_mobile="no" parallax_speed="0.3" video_mp4="" video_webm="" video_ogv="" video_url="" video_aspect_ratio="16:9" video_loop="yes" video_mute="yes" video_preview_image="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" margin_top="" margin_bottom="" padding_top="" padding_right="" padding_bottom="" padding_left=""][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type="2_3" spacing="" center_content="no" link="" target="_self" min_height="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_image_id="" background_position="left top" background_repeat="no-repeat" hover_type="none" border_size="0" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" border_radius="" box_shadow="no" dimension_box_shadow="" box_shadow_blur="0" box_shadow_spread="0" box_shadow_color="" box_shadow_style="" padding_top="" padding_right="" padding_bottom="" padding_left="" margin_top="" margin_bottom="" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset="" last="no"][fusion_text columns="" column_min_width="" column_spacing="" rule_style="default" rule_size="" rule_color="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id=""] This report takes a look into the Commission for Countering Extremism (CCE), formed in 2018. The report tackles the theoretical basis of the CCE and British counter-extremism more broadly, including its recent turn to combatting the far-right and ‘hate crime’, as the body seeks to build support for repressive counter-extremism measures. It also profiles the individuals represented on the CCE’s ‘Expert Group’ and looks in to the deeply troubling networks that have embedded themselves within the CCE and that are closely tied to the global Islamophobia industry. [/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type="1_3" spacing="" center_content="no" link="" target="_self" min_height="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_image_id="" background_position="left top" background_repeat="no-repeat" hover_type="none" border_size="0" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" border_radius="" box_shadow="no" dimension_box_shadow="" box_shadow_blur="0" box_shadow_spread="0" box_shadow_color="" box_shadow_style="" padding_top="" padding_right="" padding_bottom="" padding_left="" margin_top="" margin_bottom="" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset="" last="no"][fusion_text columns="" column_min_width="" column_spacing="" rule_style="default" rule_size="" rule_color="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id=""] CCE Exposed report download [/fusion_text][fusion_code]W2FkZF90b19jYXJ0IGlkPSIyNTI4OSJd[/fusion_code][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

Separating Families - How PREVENT Seeks the Removal of Children

September 24, 2018
This is a report unlike any that CAGE has produced before, and it comes at a crucial time. In today’s global paradigm we have become acquainted with the images and stories of children being removed from their parents in countries that espouse “freedom and democracy”. This has happened under the guise of “immigration control and preventing terrorism”. We have seen this happening in the United States and, at a lower profile but no less significant extent, in Australia. Such policies have long roots in colonialism and empire. Now, for the first time, CAGE is offering documentation that the removal of children, and the attempted removal of children, is taking place in the family courts of the United Kingdom. It is being done using an unreliable and highly subjective method of measuring “extremism” and “radicalisation”, themselves subjective terms that have not been adequately defined.

Blacklisted: The secretive Home Office Unit silencing voices of dissent

August 9, 2017
This report provides a unique insight, for the first time, of opaque units that work as part of the government’s counterterrorism policies, the Extremism Analysis Unit (EAU) and the Research Information and Communications Unit (RICU). These two units, in particular, assist the government in its Prevent strategy, by conducting research and coordinating propaganda. The report also exposes the influence of far right organisations, such as the Henry Jackson Society, in the secretive process of designating individuals as ‘extremists’. The information in this report is primarily based on two sources, witness statements given by the heads of EAU and RICU in the case of Dr Salman Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department.

Africa Review: Ethiopia - CAGE Africa

May 31, 2017
[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent="no" hundred_percent_height="no" hundred_percent_height_scroll="no" hundred_percent_height_center_content="yes" equal_height_columns="no" menu_anchor="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="center center" background_repeat="no-repeat" fade="no" background_parallax="none" enable_mobile="no" parallax_speed="0.3" video_mp4="" video_webm="" video_ogv="" video_url="" video_aspect_ratio="16:9" video_loop="yes" video_mute="yes" video_preview_image="" border_size="" border_color="" border_style="solid" margin_top="" margin_bottom="" padding_top="" padding_right="" padding_bottom="" padding_left=""][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type="1_2" spacing="" center_content="no" link="" target="_self" min_height="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="left top" background_repeat="no-repeat" hover_type="none" border_size="0" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" padding="undefined" dimension_margin="undefined" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset="" last="no"][fusion_text] This chapter of the CAGE Africa Review provides a look at some of the impact the ‘War on Terror’ has had on Ethiopia as of the end of 2016, both in terms of its judicial make-up as well as the relationship between the government and two ethnic groups in the country, the Ogaden and the Oromo, both of which are gripped in a struggle for recognition and national participation for their respective movements. The chapter does not aim to provide an exhaustive review, but it rather provides snapshots of various aspects of the ‘War on Terror’ in Ethiopia that are evidence of the absence of the rule of law and which result in abuse, in particular of Muslims but also of other groups. [/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type="1_2" spacing="" center_content="no" link="" target="_self" min_height="" hide_on_mobile="small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility" class="" id="" background_color="" background_image="" background_position="left top" background_repeat="no-repeat" hover_type="none" border_size="0" border_color="" border_style="solid" border_position="all" padding="undefined" dimension_margin="undefined" animation_type="" animation_direction="left" animation_speed="0.3" animation_offset="" last="no"][fusion_text] Africa review Ethiopia free download [/fusion_text][fusion_code]W2FkZF90b19jYXJ0IGlkPSZxdW90OzIzNDE0JnF1b3Q7XQ==[/fusion_code][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

The 'science' of pre-crime: The secret 'radicalisation' study underpinning PREVENT

September 28, 2016
In July 2015, the UK government introduced a statutory duty on all public sector workers to spot the signs of ‘radicalisation’ in order to stop their charges being ‘drawn into terrorism’. The government uses a system of 22 factors that has been developed to train these public sector employees in spotting signs of vulnerability. This CAGE report, details for the first time how the government produced these factors in secret, and subsequently relied on an evidence base that was not only unproven, but extended far beyond its original remit. Key among our findings, is the admission by those who wrote the study, that they did not factor political grievance into the modelling, a fact they say was, “perhaps an omission”. Further, the government’s study states that only trained professionals should be using these factors, and yet they have been rolled out nationally under a statutory duty imposed under the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 – ultimately being used in what they term the pre-crime space. Reviewed by 18 academics this is one of CAGE’s most robust reports that have critiqued and shed light on the government’s counter extremism strategy. Over 140 academics signed a joint letter criticising the ‘science’ underlying the government’s ‘radicalisation’ policy. They also called for the publication of the classified ERG22+ study, which underpins the entire PREVENT agenda. “This report raises far-reaching questions about evidence base and credibility of the government’s counter terrorism strategy and specifically the idea that ‘signs’ of ‘extremism’ can be listed and categorised.” Professor David Miller. “You are to be greatly commended for the watchdog role you are currently playing in rigorously scrutinising and critiquing these dubious and harmful practices by the British government. I am glad you are able to put the time, effort and expertise into such an important role.” Professor Richard Jackson, editor-in-chief of the journal Critical Studies on Terrorism. “This report raises important questions for psychologists. Most importantly, we are reminded that our psychological research can be used for purposes that it was not designed for; and that this can cause great harm.” Dr Leeda Blackwood.

Letter to the EC president

March 8, 2021
This is some text inside of a div block.

Exploiting the Pandemic

May 14, 2020
This is some text inside of a div block.

Letter to Home Secretary

January 23, 2020
This is some text inside of a div block.

Schedule 7: Harassment at Borders

August 20, 2019
This is some text inside of a div block.

CCE Exposed Report

January 6, 2019
This is some text inside of a div block.

Africa Review: Ethiopia report

May 31, 2017
This is some text inside of a div block.

The 'Science' of Pre-Crime

September 28, 2016
This is some text inside of a div block.

Consent Denied report

January 29, 2016
This is some text inside of a div block.

CAGE Brochure

July 6, 2015
This is some text inside of a div block.

ISC inquiry NGO joint letter

November 8, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Serious Crime Bill Submission

October 23, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Blowback report

July 17, 2014
This is some text inside of a div block.

Tackling Extremism in the UK: Part II

December 1, 2013
This is some text inside of a div block.

Tackling Extremism in the UK: Part I

December 1, 2013
This is some text inside of a div block.

Guantanamo Begins at Home report

April 1, 2012
This is some text inside of a div block.

CagePrisoners Annual Report 2010-11

December 1, 2011
This is some text inside of a div block.

Too blunt for just outcomes report

June 1, 2011
This is some text inside of a div block.

Detention Immorality report

November 1, 2009
This is some text inside of a div block.

Blacklisted report

August 20, 2009
This is some text inside of a div block.

Off the Record report

June 1, 2007
This is some text inside of a div block.

Fabricating Terrorism I report

March 1, 2006
This is some text inside of a div block.

Report on Ghost Detention

November 12, 2005
This is some text inside of a div block.

The Guantanamo Detainees report

May 13, 2004
This is some text inside of a div block.

Beyond the Law report

December 20, 2001
This is some text inside of a div block.
Button Text

monthly policy briefings

Each month, CAGE analysts will provide briefings on important policy developments in Britain, France and Austria relating to counter-terrorism and national security policies. The briefings are designed to be short, indispensable references for activists, academics and others interested in keeping up to date with the proliferation of War on Terror-era policies worldwide.